It is integral part of the Adobe ecosystem, desktop based, but can easily sync with the cloud. If you can’t live without Adobe but your pocket is shallow this is a possible path to take. With FRW I can get rid of the blurry, inappropriately exposed or ugly compositions right from the memory card.Īfter FRV I was in a need for a tool that ingests my photos adds copyright, caption, keywording info and GEO data in as few steps as possible.Īdobe Bridge: Free, creative asset manager from Adobe useful for Lightroom-like cataloguing. Focus peak (help to identify edge sharpness and texture sharpness).If you want to asses ETTR – exposure to the right – and maximize the dynamic range of your camera you need to look at the proper RAW histogram) RAW histogram (most software uses the JPEG histogram from the viewer image that is different from the RAW.FRV has three excellent features that did not found in other software: Before copying / moving any photos from the SD card I process a zero-culling on the card. The starting point of my workflow was unquestionably Fast Raw Viewer as the pre-ingest culling tool. No single best software exists for my purpose – unless in Heaven, but numerous software vendors with solutions excelling in one or more areas. Shortly after my seek started I had realized this job is not about the “best features” but about the compromises. The major goal of my seek was to find a software that can enable me to organize the old photos and easily write copyright info, description and keywording, face recognition where necessary and also do some culling where copies are not up to expected standard. The older collection includes JPEGs and TIFFs and lately I was shooting RAW files. Haven’t really used copyright or XMP descriptions on the majority. My 30,000+ photos are on an external HDD organized into dated folders, lousy keywording were used on about 20% of the photos as well as star ratings. I have been looking for the “best” workflow on Mac with the option to change over to Win if circumstances push me to do so. That’s the theory now let’s see the reality. Best of luck in whatever you choose.Īnother photography workflow anomaly for personal use on a MacĪ perfectly streamlined workflow can help photographers to minimize the amount of time spent in front of the computer while maximize the cataloguing job done. I think if you plan on using it just for cataloging the software looks very promising. And, I agree it was hard to find information about how to use Photo Supreme 4. It is not ideal but it works and is quick. As for how I manage my image via cataloging I basically use a file system approach and then use Lyn for Mac for organizing and find images. It was awkward compared to other PP programs. I found the workflow and the way it handled PP clunky to me. I'm surprised the lack of tutorials and documentation for the product. It's the workflow part that's most important to me - I'm hoping to figure it out. Or are you saying the interaction with a processing piece of software is clunky? Just so I understand you are saying you did not like the post processing capabilities of the software? PP? I thought the point was to you something like dxo or Capture One to do the processing and for photo Supreme to be a catalog, tagging and organizing product. It's cataloging features are impressive though. It is not a bad program, has lots of features and am sure it might work for others, just not me. The workflow did not work for me in Photo Supreme. I found the PP tools a little clunky and not that responsive on my Mac. In the end, I removed it from my computer as it did not meet criteria I like in a PP software. I recently downloaded a trail version of Photo Supreme 4 and tried it out for several days.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |